Opinion | Voices from Balochistan A Struggle for Dignity, Identity, and Control over Their Own Future

Balochistan is the largest province in Pakistan by area and has a long and complicated fight for autonomy. The province has an abundance of natural resources, and significant geopolitical importance, but the people of Balochistan feel abandoned and oppressed by the central authorities. The population in Balochistan have been demanding greater autonomy over their own land, resources, and future, and this has resulted in decades of upheaval and violence. This paper will describe the underlying causes of Balochistan’s autonomy struggles in simple language that is accessible to people who may not be familiar with the topic.
Soon after Pakistan was created in 1947, the conflict began. Although Balochistan is a province today, it was not one province at that time; it was composed of various princely states, the largest of which was the Khanate of Kalat. When Pakistan annexed Kalat in 1948, many Baloch leaders bitterly opposed this, arguing that Kalat should have remained independent or been permitted to decide its future. This was to mark the beginning of the war between Baloch nationalists and the Pakistani state.
Several uprisings have taken place in Balochistan thereafter. The four major insurrections occurred in 1948, 1958, 1962, 1973, and the ongoing movement beginning in 2004. Each insurrection ignited around the same fundamental calls, which was increased autonomy, equitable resource distribution, and respect for Baloch identity.
Historically, Islamabad Balochistan tensions have been politically and economically motivated. Many of the province’s residents have felt isolated from national decision-making. They believe policies toward Balochistan are typically crafted in Islamabad with minimal input from local members of parliament. This has created a strong sense of political alienation among the Baloch people throughout the years.
One of the Baloch’s major demands is autonomy over natural resources. Sui gas field, discovered in the 1950s, produces most of Pakistan’s gas; yet large parts of Balochistan are denied access to gas for civilian use. This creates resentment and sustains the feeling that the province is being exploited.
In recent years, mega infrastructure projects like CPEC have also boosted demands for autonomy. While the Gwadar port, a component of CPEC, promises economic growth, local people say they have not been consulted or engaged in planning. They worry that the economic benefits will go to other provinces or overseas investors and the people of Balochistan will be left out.
Protests, political activism, and demonstrations have grown more common as individuals seek to have more control over their fate. Different nationalist parties and civil society organizations keep demanding greater provincial autonomy, uniform distribution of resources, and acknowledgment of their culture. Most individuals feel that Balochistan should be granted the right to decide its own policy regarding education, health, and local development.
The federal government has tried to correct these issues. The 18th Constitutional Amendment, enacted in 2010, was meant to grant the provinces greater control over their affairs. Critics hold that the amendment has not been effectively enforced in Balochistan. They allege that federal intervention in core areas remains and true power remains vested in the center.
Security concerns have also had an impact on autonomy debates. Armed conflicts and military operations within the region have created a deep legacy. Writings of testimony about extrajudicial executions, enforced disappearances, and human rights violations have created the atmosphere of suspicion. Missing persons’ families also continue to cry for justice, and several human rights groups have called for accountability and transparency in security operations. Rather than making it difficult to solve the challenges, the vast majority of the people of Balochistan continue to stand on peaceful and democratic solutions. Youth groups, student unions, and human rights groups are working tirelessly to raise awareness and bring change through non-violent means. Their objective is to achieve a future where Balochistan is treated justly, and its people are given the respect and rights they are entitled to.
One key area of focus is education. Balochistan’s literacy, especially among females, is near the bottom nationwide. Most believe that a freer provincial government would be more able to tackle these problems through investments in the schools, production of good-quality teachers, and encouragement of local language- and culture-sensitive education.
Health care within the province is also lacking. In rural areas, hospitals are few and far between, and medical equipment is often in short supply. Natives argue that this is due to local decision-making on health care budgets and policy not taking place. They believe independence would allow for better and more focused development.
Cultural identity plays a leading role in the autonomy movement. Baloch heritage, culture, and language have been historically underserved in national media and national education systems. Most think increased autonomy would allow them to preserve and celebrate their unique culture. They feel they need recognition of culture in order to promote feelings of belonging and pride.
The participation of women in the autonomy movement in Balochistan is also increasing. Increasing numbers of women are participating in protests, political debate, and development work. Their participation is adding to the widening of the debate and attention on gender-specific issues like access to healthcare, education, and jobs.
International observers and human rights organizations have repeatedly expressed concerns about the fate of Balochistan. They have requested the Pakistani government to respect human rights, relax the military’s hold over the civilian population, and initiate sincere dialogue with the Baloch leadership. Foreign diplomats and foreign policy experts also agreed that unless political settlements dominate military operations, peaceful resolution is possible in the region.
For lasting reform, the vast majority of experts believe that confidence must be established by frank exchanges and realistic reform by the federal and provincial governments. Devolution of power, transparency in the government, and people’s participation are considered as key steps. More and more, there is a feeling that transferring greater autonomy to Balochistan over resources and policy formulation will not only benefit the province but also be a step toward national integration.
Lastly, the Balochistan liberation war is not politics. It is about dignity, justice, and freedom to choose for oneself. They want to decide about their own lives and be an equal member of the union. While arguments continue long enough, the only certainty is that attempting to address their problems with sincere intention and respect is imperative in creating a strong and united Pakistan.
Yasminashah457@gmail.com