English
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Russian
Spanish
Urdu
SRINAGAR: The High Court of J&K and Ladakh on Tuesday said that there was no reason not to recommend the case of a person for issuance of passport just for the involvement of his brother and father in militancy activities, reported Kashmir Observer.
Allowing a petition filed by one Mohammad Amir Malik, a bench of Justice M A Chowdhary directed Additional Director General of Police, CID to re-submit the report uninfluenced by the conduct or activities of the brother as well as Malik’s father to Regional Passport Officer (RPO) within four weeks.
The court asked the RPO to consider case of the Malik, a resident of Ramban, on the report of ADGP CID and pass an appropriate order in Malik’s favour within two weeks thereafter.
Being a diploma holder in Engineering, Malik submitted that he desired to go abroad in search of good job as a career and as such had applied for issuance of a passport through online process on 6 September 2021 and was informed that his case would be processed subsequent to CID/Police verification etc.
However, passport was not issued to him as such he approached the court. The ADGP submitted to the court that passport verification report in respect of character and antecedents of Malik was got verified through field agencies which revealed that his brother remained a militant of Hizbul MUjahideen outfit who was killed during an encounter with security forces 2011 and that his father was enlisted as OGW in the records
“While the protection of personal liberty guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution is available to a person, the said right cannot be claimed as a matter of right by a person who is an anarchist or a person attempting to destabilize the security and integrity of our State,” the court said, adding, “It is precisely for those reasons that the provisions of Section 6(2) sub-sections (a) to (i) have been incorporated in the Passports Act, 1967.”
The court said that the authorities would certainly be justified in not recommending Malik’s case for issuance of passport had there been any iota of allegation against him or his involvement in any subversive activities which could be deemed to be activities prejudicial to the security, sovereignty and integrity of the State.
“It should have been the activities of the petitioner (Malik) which should have formed the basis either for permitting or rejecting the request for issuance of passport in his favour,” the court said, adding, “The basis for not recommending the case of the petitioner (Malik) for issuance of passport does not have any reasonable relation or nexus with the activities of the petitioner (Malik) as the same do not even remotely connect the petitioner (Malik) with any activity which could be termed as prejudicial to the security, sovereignty and integrity of the State or the Country.”
The non-recommendation of Malik’s case, teh court observed, is based upon material “which can be said to be nothing but in the realm of speculation.”
“The petitioner (Malik) cannot be deprived of his right as enshrined under Article 21 of the Constitution on the basis of the alleged misdemeanors of his brother,” the court said and directed the Additional Director General of Police, CID to re-submit the report uninfluenced by the conduct or activities of Malik’s brother as well as his father to the Regional Passport Officer within four weeks. The RPO, the court said, shall consider Malik’s case on the report of the ADGP and pass an appropriate order in Malik’s favour within two weeks thereafter.
