Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) was introduced with the noble intention of protecting married women from cruelty and harassment within their matrimonial homes. Enacted in 1983, the provision criminalizes cruelty by husbands or their relatives towards a wife, and those found guilty can face imprisonment and fines. While the law was instituted to address the genuine concerns of abused women, there has been a growing concern about its misuse in recent years.
Understanding Section 498A:
Section 498A of the IPC states that whoever, being the husband or the relative of the husband of a woman, subjects her to cruelty shall be punished with imprisonment for a term that may extend to three years and shall also be liable to a fine. The provision defines cruelty broadly to include both physical and mental harm inflicted upon the wife.
Misuse of Section 498A:
False Allegations: One of the primary concerns surrounding Section 498A is the potential for false allegations. In some cases, disgruntled wives or their families misuse the provision to settle personal scores, seek revenge, or gain an upper hand in matrimonial disputes. The lack of stringent safeguards against false accusations has led to innocent individuals facing legal consequences without due process.
Arbitrary Arrests: The provision allows for the immediate arrest of the accused upon the filing of a complaint. This has resulted in the arbitrary arrest of many individuals without proper investigation. Critics argue that the provision’s misuse has led to a situation where the accused are presumed guilty until proven innocent, reversing the fundamental principle of justice.
Pressure for Settlement: Some individuals misuse Section 498A as a tool to exert pressure on the accused and their families to reach a financial settlement. This can lead to the exploitation of the legal system for personal gains rather than seeking justice for actual instances of cruelty.
Strained Family Relations: False accusations under Section 498A can irreparably damage family relationships. The stigma associated with such cases often leads to the social isolation of the accused and their families, even if they are later acquitted. This aspect of the misuse of the provision can have long-lasting emotional and psychological effects on the accused and their families.
Against Husband & Relatives: With the rise in the rate of education, financial security, and modernization, the more independent and the radical feminists have made Section 498A of IPC as a weapon in their hands than a shield. Due to this, many helpless husbands and their relatives have become the victims of the vengeful daughters-in-law of their house.
Blackmail Attempts: These days in many cases where Section 498A is invoked, they turn out to be false cases as they turn out to be mere blackmail attempts by the wife (or her close relatives) when troubled with a stressed marriage. Due to this, in most cases the Section 498A complaint is generally followed by the demand of a huge amount of money to settle the case outside the court.
Degradation of Marriage: The court held specifically that there is misuse and exploitation of the provisions to such an extent that it was hitting on the basis that is the foundation of marriage itself. This has ultimately proved to be not a good sign for the health of society for the public at large. Women have begun misusing Section 498 of IPC as this law is a tool for their vengeance or to get out of wedlock.
Malimath Committee Report, 2003: Similar views were also expressed by the 2003 Malimath Committee report on reforms in the criminal justice system. The committee noted that the “general complaint” of Section 498A of the IPC to be a subject to gross misuse.
Inadequate Legal Safeguards: The absence of stringent penalties for false accusers and the lack of preventive measures to curb arbitrary arrests contribute to the misuse of Section 498A. Critics argue that the law needs to be amended to include provisions that deter false complainants and protect the rights of the accused.
Way forward
While Section 498A was enacted with the laudable goal of protecting married women from cruelty, its misuse is a matter of serious concern. Striking a balance between protecting the rights of women and preventing the misuse of the provision is crucial. Reforms that address the concerns of arbitrary arrests, false allegations, and the lack of legal safeguards are necessary to ensure that the intended purpose of Section 498A is not undermined, while simultaneously protecting the rights of the accused and their families. It is important to note that the domestic violence and abuse by the spouse and family members are very complex behaviors and the social organization of courts, legal cultures, and the police systematically tend to devalue several domestic violence cases.
Therefore the perspective of the state and the people needs to change from potential “misuse” of the concerned laws of domestic violence to that of implementing it for their real purpose.
Author Nadeem Khaliq is a practicing Lawyer and can be reached through his email: adv.nadeemkhaliq@gmail.com